Syrian President May Consider More Border Crossings for Earthquake Aid: WHO

Mon Feb 13 2023
author image
Muhammd Mudassar Siddique
Syrian President May Consider More Border Crossings for Earthquake Aid: WHO
icon-facebook icon-twitter icon-whatsapp

Monitoring Desk

DAMASCUS: The World Health Organization (WHO) chief has said that Syrian President Bashar Assad had expressed openness to more border crossings for assistance to be brought to earthquake victims in the country’s rebel-controlled northwest areas, Arab media reported on Sunday.

WHO chief visits Syria

Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus held a meeting with Assad in Damascus on Sunday to discuss the response to the earthquake which has killed over 33,000 people in Syria and Turkiye.

The WHO chief said that the compounding crises of conflict, economic decline, Covid, cholera, and now the quake had taken an unbearable toll.

The situation is dire in the rebel-controlled area in the northwest parts of Syria, which cannot receive aid from government-controlled areas of the country without Assad’s authorization.

Read Also: WHO Chief Arrives in Quake-hit Syria to Monitor Relief Operation

The only border crossing open to transport aid from Turkey also witnessed its operations disrupted by the earthquake.

Tedros told a virtual press conference from Damascus “I met with President Assad, who hinted he was open to mulling additional cross-border access points for this emergency situation”.

icon-facebook icon-twitter icon-whatsapp
Saudi Vice Foreign Minister, GCC-Brazil Joint Ministerial Meeting, Riyadh,

Saudi Vice Foreign Minister Attends GCC-Brazil Joint Ministerial Meeting
Starmer, Pensioners, Fuel, Benefits

Starmer Faces Key Test with Fuel Benefit Cuts for Pensioners
Polls Open, Parliamentary Elections, Jordan,

Polls Open in Parliamentary Elections in Jordan

Latest

Ugandan

Ugandan Olympian Rebecca Cheptegei death Highlights Gender-Based Violence Crisis
Saudi Vice Foreign Minister, GCC-Brazil Joint Ministerial Meeting, Riyadh,

Saudi Vice Foreign Minister Attends GCC-Brazil Joint Ministerial Meeting
Starmer, Pensioners, Fuel, Benefits

Starmer Faces Key Test with Fuel Benefit Cuts for Pensioners
Polls Open, Parliamentary Elections, Jordan,

Polls Open in Parliamentary Elections in Jordan
Hollywood, RIP Dad, Mourns, James Earl Jones, Voice, Darth Vader,

Hollywood Mourns James Earl Jones

Videos

Kabul

From Kabul to London: Afghan Outlets Find Ways to Magnify Women’s Voices
Japanese Climbers Clean World's Tallest Bronze Buddha

Japanese Climbers Clean World’s Tallest Bronze Buddha
Nigeria, Fuel, Tanker, Explosion, Niger State Emergency Management Agency, Niger State Emergency Management Agency, World Health Organization

Fuel Tanker Explosion Claims 59 Lives in Nigeria

Op-Ed

Afghanistan continues to pose multiple security threats to neighborly countries. Afghan interim government commonly known as the Taliban regime recently celebrated the third anniversary of their takeover of Kabul. Taliban’s speedy takeover and the quick meltdown of the Ashraf Ghani regime both are remembered as meaningful surprising events in the checkered history of Afghanistan. The subsequent withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan triggered numerous intriguing questions. The apparent hasty withdrawal of American forces though celebrated as a victory by the Taliban however it could not bring any stability to Afghanistan. Though withdrawal took place under Joe Biden’s watch, however, the grounds were prepared by the Trump administration prior to leaving the white house consequent to election defeat. The arrival of the Taliban in Kabul as an uncontested force on 15th Aug 2021 made the whole American campaign a shadowy affair stretched over almost two decades. Critiques are justified in questioning the outcome of such a lengthy military and political campaign orchestrated by the USA in Afghanistan. No satisfactory response has ever surfaced from the State Department and Pentagon sides about the quick meltdown of the Afghan National Army. It is obvious that the surprisingly expeditious winding up of the Ashraf Ghani regime further exposed the weaknesses of the whole American prescription applied to heal Afghanistan. The multiple damaging effects of the ill-conceived strategy on the war-torn society of Afghanistan are not too difficult to understand. Present-day Afghanistan is more polarized and unsettled under the Taliban’s unelected regime. The demolition of the political façade in August 2021 was not a sudden development but rather a much-expected outcome of the dubious Doha agreement. Analysts having fair insight into the Afghan dynamics were apprehensive about the American deal with the Taliban while Ashraf Ghani was very much present in the office of President. Simply put, the American direct agreement with the Taliban in Doha was actually the beginning of the end of Ashraf Ghani's regime. Bitterness in bilateral ties between Pakistan and Afghanistan has been constantly growing over the issue of cross-border terrorism. Against all the positive expectations of Islamabad, the interim Afghan government has not responded against the Khawarij which comprises the banned TTP and its numerous splinter groups. Ironically, the Taliban regime is providing all sorts of support to those Khawarij terrorists who are involved in attacks on Pakistani security forces, unarmed civilians and military installations. Facts and figures clearly reflect the alarming rise in cross-border terrorist attacks inside Pakistan after the arrival of the Taliban on Kabul’s throne. Pakistan has rightly questioned the liberty of action granted to the Khawarij terrorists on Afghan soil by the interim Taliban setup. These genuine security concerns have been conveyed to the Taliban regime through all available channels. Repeated engagements from the Pakistan side via diplomatic, political, religious and media channels, nothing positive could not gain any breakthrough in finishing the bloody cycle of terrorism. Growing security concerns gradually taking the shape of anger in Pakistan because huge losses to men and materials are crossing the limits of patience. Unwise rulers of Kabul are acting against the interests of a neighbor like Pakistan who always stood alongside Afghan brethren in hours of need. It seems that sympathizers of Khawarij (banned TTP) are now dominating the interim Afghan government and saner elements have lost their say in the decision-making process. Multiple reports released by the UN, EU and international watchdogs have revealed undeniable information about the active presence of global terrorist groups in Afghanistan. The Taliban regime is in denial mode and seems in a mood to continue with the present harmful policies. The loud arrogance of Taliban officials on the highly objectionable stance about cross-border terrorism is endangering regional peace. In a recent statement, the military chief of the interim Afghan government Qari Fasihuddin Fitrat has denied any presence of banned TTP elements in Afghanistan. This absurd denial is credible evidence of the Taliban’s contradicting stance about the presence of Khawarij (Banned TTP) on Afghan soil. How Qari Fasihullah Fitrat can ask for evidence of Khawarij’s existence while Taliban supreme leader Hibatullah Akhundzadah urged Afghans through a fatwa to refrain from joining the terrorism spree of banned TTP against Pakistan last year. This unambiguous religious decree released by none other than the supreme Taliban leader is itself strong evidence of Khawarij’s anti-Pakistan designs. It is also evident that the top leadership of the Taliban especially supreme leader Habibullah Akhudzada comprehends the undesired complications linked to the cross-border terrorism from Afghan soil. Bleak consequences of flawed terrorism-specific policies are widely hurting Afghanistan’s repute and relations with neighborly countries. Hollowness of Taliban’s denial can be measured from the multiple killings of Khawarij (TTP) wanted commanders on Afghanistan’s soil. A recent report released by a sub-committee of the UN Security Council has openly mentioned the banned TTP as the biggest terrorist group operating with impunity from Afghanistan. Being an unelected force, the Taliban’s rule in Afghanistan lacks legitimacy. The commitment of such an illegitimate regime with the banned terrorist groups of various brands merits a regional response as already proposed by PM Shahbaz Sharif during a recent past event at the SCO forum.

Terrorists on Afghan Soil
Kashmir, Democratic, Facade, Vote, Siege

Democratic Facade: Kashmir’s Vote Under Siege
Pakistan

Decoding Pakistan-KSA Defense Cooperation and Emerging Threats